CMA Study Group

Expand all | Collapse all

cash flow reconcilation

  • 1.  cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-01-2012 03:15 AM

    anyone can explain why a decrease in accumulated depreciation, caused by major repair to projection equipment  does not affect cash flow during calculating the reconciliation of  the net income to cash flow. 

    -------------------------------------------
    Hai Bin Wang
    Beijing
    China
    -------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-02-2012 07:17 AM

    More details about the problem might be needed in order to address your question.

    First, depreciation is a NON-CASH expense, it does not affect cash, and a company will never pay cash out for this expense.  When a company records deprecation, we increase depreciation expense (debit) and increase accumulated depreciation (credit), and as you can see, the cash account is never involved.  This is why we ADD depreciation EXPENSE back to Net Income in order to reconcile it to Cash. 

    Second, if you are showing a decrease in accumulated depreciation, this tells me that the company must have sold off or disposed of some equipment.  When we sell equipment, we remove it from the accounting records in all accounts involved.  For instance we could increase cash (debit) for the proceeds received, decrease equipment (credit) for the equipment sold, remove its accumulated depreciation (debit), and then there will either be a gain (credit revenue) or loss (debit expense) on the sale.  The gain or loss on the equipment sale is incorporated into the reconciliation process.  Within the operating activities, gains are subtracted from operating income and losses are added to operating income because they are included in Net Income but really are not operating activities.  The entire proceeds received from the equipment sale would then be recorded under investing activities.

     

    -------------------------------------------

    Patricia Abels CPA
    Academic
    The University of Findlay
    Findlay OH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 3.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-02-2012 10:37 AM
    Ur concept here is totally wrong.. Repair is nt depreciation.. Repair is considered as a repair cost.. Where as depreciation is the reduction in the value of asset, and since there is no cash flow involved v don't take it in cash flow calculation.. Whereas repair cost is taken in cash flow.. ------------------------------------------- Muhammad Zaki Godil Student Jeddah Saudi Arabia -------------------------------------------


  • 4.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-03-2012 04:46 PM
    Actually Patricia is 100% correct.  Probably pretty silly to argue with a CPA on depreciation.  There are not many people on this discussion board that really know their stuff and can help answer questions.  Perhaps it would be wise to not push those people out.

    -------------------------------------------
    Sandra Possin
    Seattle WA
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 5.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-04-2012 10:49 AM

    Sandra,

    Thanks for your support.  It is better to make Muhammad's mistake here instead of on the exam.  I always enjoy reading your posts; you are very encouraging to many candidates.   I tend to be quiet, and enjoy solving questions.  Thanks again and good luck on your exams.  Patti

     



    -------------------------------------------
    Patricia Abels CPA
    Academic
    The University of Findlay
    Coldwater OH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 6.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-04-2012 08:49 AM

    I disagree with you Muhammad.  The DB stated a "MAJOR REPAIR" to the equipment.   These key words are words you need to pick up during the CMA/CPA exams in order to pass.  More facts about the scenario would also be helpful.

    Expenses for repairs and maintenance generally are expenses when incurred.  However, when adding a "major" expenditure for the improvement  of an asset, those expenditures should be capitalized because future benefits are received.  The cost of the improvement usually increases future benefits and should be capitalized by increasing the book value of the old related asset and depreciated over the useful life of the improved asset.  There are actually 3 methods used to record the cost of improvements. 

    (1) Substitution - the improvement is recorded as both (a) a disposition of the old component and (b) the acquisition of the new component.

    (2) Capitalization of new cost - the cost of the improvement is a debit to the related asset, without removing the original cost and accumulated depreciation of the original equipment.  This method is acceptable when the book value of the original equipment has been reduced to a immaterial amount.

    (3) Reduction in accumulated depreciation - to increase an assets book value is to leave the asset account unaltered but decrease its related accumulated depreciation.  This approach produces the same book value as the capitalization of cost to the asset account. 

     

     



    -------------------------------------------
    Patricia Abels CPA
    Academic
    The University of Findlay
    Coldwater OH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 7.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-04-2012 09:03 AM

    I disagree with you Muhammad about your cash flow remark.  Using the Indirect cash flow reporting, expenses are NEVER listed in the Operating section of the statement of cash flows.   Indirectly, the expense is reported because you are using Net Income, which net income is derived from taking revenue less expenses.  Then adjustments are made to Net Income in order to convert Net Income over to cash flows.  What are those adjustments?  One of the adjustments is to add back all non-cash expenses, and depreciation is considered one of the non-cash items.



    -------------------------------------------
    Patricia Abels CPA
    Academic
    The University of Findlay
    Coldwater OH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 8.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-06-2012 02:25 AM

    Hi Patricia,
    I am bit late in joining this discussion but I find it quite interesting. Thank you for refreshing me with the cash flow reports. I have not  done anything regarding cash flows report for a long time in my actual work, so I am a bit confused here.

    I agree with you that A Major repair will be capitalized by reducing "Accumulated Depreciation" of the repaired assets if the repair is considered to lengthen the life of the asset.

    The original Han Bing question is "anyone can explain why a decrease in accumulated depreciation, caused by major repair to projection equipment  does not affect cash flow during calculating the reconciliation of  the net income to cash flow". 

    I have read through all the email trails and try to find  a direct answer to that question.

    You stated in your earlier email that we only did the reconciliation if we used the indirect method and if I may add, we only do that for "Cash flow from Operating Activities".

    Back to Han Bing question, when he asked why a major repair does not affect the cash flow during reconciliation, am I correct to infer that  the answer is "because the cash outflow  from  that "Major Repair"  transaction is not part of "Cash Flow from Operating Activities" but part of "Cash Flow from Investing Activities" hence it will not show up in the reconciliation of net income to operating cash flows". ?Am I correct ?

     

    Regards

     

    Johanes


    -------------------------------------------
    Johanes Halim
    Director/Manager
    JAKARTA
    Indonesia
    -------------------------------------------








  • 9.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-06-2012 07:40 AM
    I think Johanes nailed it. I read the question over and over and I found myself over-analyzing it. The question is simple.


    Q:Will a decrease  in accumulated depreciation caused by repair of an equipment (in effect capitalizing the cost of repair) affect the net profit adjusted for non-cash expenses/revenue?

    Ans: NO. 
    It will be shown in the INVESTING ACTIVITIES, not in OPERATING ACTIVITIES.

    I hope this helps.







  • 10.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-06-2012 08:28 AM

    Johanes you get the gold star - your analysis sounds correct.    

     

    More facts surrounding the problem would have been helpful.  The accumulated depreciation account is associated with long-term assets, and hence is not directly a part of the operating section.  When a long-term asset is purchased, the cash disbursement appears under the investing section of the cash flows.  The accumulated depreciation can assist us in different ways.  First, if you are showing a decrease in accumulated depreciation, the company may have sold off or disposed of some equipment.   If the company did, this would result in a gain or loss, and gains and losses are a part of the operating section because gains and losses were included in deriving net income, and hence needs to be reversed.  This is why we subtract gains and add losses within the operating section.  Whereas the cash received for the item sold is reported under the investing section.  Second, reduction in accumulated depreciation could also be used to increase an assets book value due to that major repair. The cash disbursed for the long-term capitalized repair would once again appear in the investing section. 

     



    -------------------------------------------
    Patricia Abels CPA
    Academic
    The University of Findlay
    Findlay OH
    United States
    -------------------------------------------








  • 11.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-06-2012 09:11 AM

    Agree with you Patricia. Posting the original question would have helped.

    As for my understanding, the question is asking whether the transaction affects the net profit adjusted for non-cash income/expenses (aka Net profit before working capital changes) in Operating Activities section. 


    But if the question was aimed at the Net cash from Operating Activities, the answer would have been YES because either cash or creditor's account would have been credited. To wit:

    Accumulated depreciation              xx
    Cash/Accounts payable                          xx   









  • 12.  RE:cash flow reconcilation

    Posted 06-06-2012 10:28 AM
    Thanks, Patricia.
    I also find your  explanations on various  topics helpful. After so many years absorbed by work routines, joining the discussions refreshes my memory and broadens my knowledge.

    -------------------------------------------
    Johanes Halim
    Director/Manager
    JAKARTA
    Indonesia
    -------------------------------------------